Intergroup contact and religiosity as predictor of between group attitudes in conflict environment
Lalić Bojan R.; Ranđelović Dušan J. · 2013 · Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Prištini
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to identify relations between level of religiosity and level of contact on one side and social attitudes towards members of religious out-groups in conflict environment on the other side. This research was conducted on the sample of Christian Orthodox students in Kosovska Mitrovica (which is partially conflict environment) and the Muslims were the out-group towards whom attitudes were analyzed. Attitudes measures we used were social distance scale and semantic differential. Likert type scale was used for religiosity measure, quantity and quality of contact. Control
Abstract by Lalić Bojan R.; Ranđelović Dušan J., Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Prištini (2013) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
The Effectiveness of A Gratitude-Based Counseling Program In Developing Psychological Well-Being Among Female Students Of King Khalid University In Abha City
Failed Experiment ReportUnraveling the effects of a rehabilitation program on the socioeconomic wellbeing of beggars and begging motivation: evidence from an urban area of Bangladesh
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Effect of Robotics and Coding Education on Girls’ STEM Motivation, Attitude and Career Aspirations
Negative / Null Result ReportThe effect of environmental values, beliefs, and norms on social entrepreneurial intentions among Chinese university students
Negative / Null Result ReportPsychological science from 'publish or perish' to 'trust but verify'
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ