e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanities

Psychological science from 'publish or perish' to 'trust but verify'

Keljanović Anđela D. · 2021 · Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Prištini

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

The finding, in one line

It was soon followed by the report of a series of nine studies that failed to replicate the 'professor's study'.

Abstract

At the time when social psychologists believed they could be proud of their discipline, there was the devastating news that Diederik Stapel had committed a major scientific fraud. This event coincided with the start of the discussion on trust in psychological findings. It was soon followed by the report of a series of nine studies that failed to replicate the 'professor's study'. These replication results were astounding due to earlier reports of successful replications. Due to the crisis of confidence in the results of field research, the Open Science Collaboration subsequently replicated 100

Abstract by Keljanović Anđela D., Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Prištini (2021) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.5937/zrffp51-24851