e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 43

A multi-site study on medical school selection, performance, motivation and engagement

Anouk Wouters; Gerda Croiset; Nienke R. Schripsema; Janke Cohen‐Schotanus; Gerard Spaai; Robert L. Hulsman; Rashmi A. Kusurkar · 2017 · Advances in Health Sciences Education

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Medical schools seek ways to improve their admissions strategies, since the available methods prove to be suboptimal for selecting the best and most motivated students. In this multi-site cross-sectional questionnaire study, we examined the value of (different) selection procedures compared to a weighted lottery procedure, which includes direct admission based on top pre-university grade point averages (≥8 out of 10; top-pu-GPA). We also considered whether students had participated in selection, prior to being admitted through weighted lottery. Year-1 (pre-clinical) and Year-4 (clinical) stude

Abstract by Anouk Wouters; Gerda Croiset; Nienke R. Schripsema; Janke Cohen‐Schotanus; Gerard Spaai; Robert L. Hulsman; Rashmi A. Kusurkar, Advances in Health Sciences Education (2017) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1007/s10459-016-9745-y