e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedicine· cited by 46

SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial

Christoph Rochlitz; Martin Bigler; Roger von Moos; Jürg Bernhard; Klazien Matter‐Walstra; Andreas Wicki; Khalil Zaman; Sandro Anchisi · 2016 · BMC Cancer

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We aimed to demonstrate decreased toxicity with metronomic chemotherapy/bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel/bevacizumab. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized phase III trial compared bevacizumab with either paclitaxel (arm A) or daily oral capecitabine-cyclophosphamide (arm B) as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of selected grade 3-5 adverse events (AE) including: febrile

Abstract by Christoph Rochlitz; Martin Bigler; Roger von Moos; Jürg Bernhard; Klazien Matter‐Walstra; Andreas Wicki; Khalil Zaman; Sandro Anchisi, BMC Cancer (2016) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2823-y