e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessInfectious and parasitic diseases

Comparative field evaluation of kelambu traps, barrier screens and barrier screens with eaves for longitudinal surveillance of adult Anopheles mosquitoes in Sulawesi, Indonesia

Jenna R. Davidson; Isra Wahid; Rusdiyah Sudirman; Victoria Makuru; Hajar Hasan; Andi Muhammad Arfah; Nirwana Nur; Muhammad Yusuf Hidayat · 2019 · Parasites & Vectors

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract Background Sampling methodologies for mosquitoes that are capable of transmitting vector-borne infectious diseases provide critical information on entomological endpoints. Reliable and meaningful field data is vital to the understanding of basic vector biology as well as disease transmission. Various traps take advantage of different vector behaviors and are inevitably subject to sampling biases. This study represents the first comparison of kelambu traps (KT) to barrier screens (BS), barrier screens with eaves (BSE) and indoor and outdoor human landing catches (HLCs). Methods Two tra

Abstract by Jenna R. Davidson; Isra Wahid; Rusdiyah Sudirman; Victoria Makuru; Hajar Hasan; Andi Muhammad Arfah; Nirwana Nur; Muhammad Yusuf Hidayat, Parasites & Vectors (2019) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1186/s13071-019-3649-7