e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessOphthalmology

Efficacy of two vertically integrated teaching–learning methods – The ocular basic science workshop versus lecture in enhancing knowledge and skills of ocular examination techniques and underlying principles in second clinical year medical students: A prospective interventional study

Anika Amritanand; Danica Lyngwa; Nimmy Thomas; Ann Eapen; Jeffrey Immanuel; Timothy Prabhu; Supraja Srivatsava; Upasana Kachroo · 2021 · TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of two vertically integrated teaching–learning methods, a peer-led ocular basic science workshop (OBSW) versus lecture by ophthalmology faculty, in enhancing the underlying basic science knowledge and examination skills of ophthalmic clinical tests among second clinical year medical students. Design: This was a prospective, interventional comparative study. Students were randomly assigned to peer-led OBSW and interactive lecture-based method of teaching by a faculty. Change in knowledge was assessed using pre and post multiple-choic

Abstract by Anika Amritanand; Danica Lyngwa; Nimmy Thomas; Ann Eapen; Jeffrey Immanuel; Timothy Prabhu; Supraja Srivatsava; Upasana Kachroo, TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research (2021) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_14_21