e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology· cited by 13

Fusing metabolomics data sets with heterogeneous measurement errors

Sandra Waaijenborg; Oksana Korobko; Ko Willems van Dijk; Mirjam A. Lips; Thomas Hankemeier; Tom F. Wilderjans; Age K. Smilde; Johan A. Westerhuis · 2018 · PLoS ONE

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Combining different metabolomics platforms can contribute significantly to the discovery of complementary processes expressed under different conditions. However, analysing the fused data might be hampered by the difference in their quality. In metabolomics data, one often observes that measurement errors increase with increasing measurement level and that different platforms have different measurement error variance. In this paper we compare three different approaches to correct for the measurement error heterogeneity, by transformation of the raw data, by weighted filtering before modelling

Abstract by Sandra Waaijenborg; Oksana Korobko; Ko Willems van Dijk; Mirjam A. Lips; Thomas Hankemeier; Tom F. Wilderjans; Age K. Smilde; Johan A. Westerhuis, PLoS ONE (2018) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0195939