e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology· cited by 53

Mendelian randomization highlights significant difference and genetic heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease GWAS and self-report proxy phenotype GWAX

Haijie Liu; Yang Hu; Yan Zhang; Haihua Zhang; Shan Gao; Longcai Wang; Tao Wang; Zhifa Han · 2022 · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Until now, Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have investigated the causal association of risk factors with Alzheimer's disease (AD) using large-scale AD genome-wide association studies (GWAS), GWAS by proxy (GWAX), and meta-analyses of GWAS and GWAX (GWAS+GWAX) datasets. However, it currently remains unclear about the consistency of MR estimates across these GWAS, GWAX, and GWAS+GWAX datasets. METHODS: Here, we first selected 162 independent educational attainment genetic variants as the potential instrumental variables (N = 405,072). We then selected one AD GWAS dataset (N = 63

Abstract by Haijie Liu; Yang Hu; Yan Zhang; Haihua Zhang; Shan Gao; Longcai Wang; Tao Wang; Zhifa Han, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1186/s13195-022-00963-3