e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 303

Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension

Mante S. Nieuwland; Stephen Politzer‐Ahles; Evelien Heyselaar; Katrien Segaert; Emily Darley; Nina Kazanina; Sarah Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn; Federica Bartolozzi · 2018 · eLife

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Do people routinely pre-activate the meaning and even the phonological form of upcoming words? The most acclaimed evidence for phonological prediction comes from a 2005 Nature Neuroscience publication by DeLong, Urbach and Kutas, who observed a graded modulation of electrical brain potentials (N400) to nouns and preceding articles by the probability that people use a word to continue the sentence fragment (‘cloze’). In our direct replication study spanning 9 laboratories (N=334), pre-registered replication-analyses and exploratory Bayes factor analyses successfully replicated the noun-results

Abstract by Mante S. Nieuwland; Stephen Politzer‐Ahles; Evelien Heyselaar; Katrien Segaert; Emily Darley; Nina Kazanina; Sarah Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn; Federica Bartolozzi, eLife (2018) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.7554/elife.33468