e-ISSN: Pending
Replication FailureOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 2,026

Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

Scott Marek; Brenden Tervo‐Clemmens; Finnegan J. Calabro; David F. Montez; Benjamin P. Kay; Alexander S. Hatoum; Meghan Rose Donohue; William Foran · 2022 · Nature

WASTE classifies this as Replication Failure · AI classification, approximate

A previously reported effect did not replicate here — verify it holds before you build on it.

Abstract

Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has transformed our understanding of the human brain through well-replicated mapping of abilities to specific structures (for example, lesion studies) and functions 1–3 (for example, task functional MRI (fMRI)). Mental health research and care have yet to realize similar advances from MRI. A primary challenge has been replicating associations between inter-individual differences in brain structure or function and complex cognitive or mental health phenotypes (brain-wide association studies (BWAS)). Such BWAS have typically relied on sample sizes approp

Abstract by Scott Marek; Brenden Tervo‐Clemmens; Finnegan J. Calabro; David F. Montez; Benjamin P. Kay; Alexander S. Hatoum; Meghan Rose Donohue; William Foran, Nature (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9