Demonstrate the quality of your bereavement service
Elliott Jane · 2011 · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
WASTE classifies this as Protocol · AI classification, approximate
A protocol that failed or needed troubleshooting — useful to read before you run the same steps.
Abstract (excerpt)
Introduction Two bereavement audit tools have been written to enable Hospices to collect crucial data to evidence high quality service provision based on national standards. Aims To enable hospices to evidence the standard of their…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial comparing (extended) pleurectomy decortication versus no (extended) pleurectomy decortication for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
ProtocolRight to replicate? A preliminary comparative experimental approach to the use of replicas in taphonomic analyses using the scanning electron microscope
ProtocolDevelopment of a scanning algorithm
ProtocolProtocol: Comparative efficacy of 2 mL vs. 5 mL 0.375% ropivacaine in subparaneural upper trunk brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery-a randomized noninferiority trial.
ProtocolFusion Molecules Between the STAT5b Inhibitor Stafib-2-CR and a Cereblon Ligand.
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: Crossref · DOI 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000105.128