Development of a scanning algorithm
Yinuo Zhao; Hongbiao Zeng; null null; null null; null null; null null · 2020 · John Heinrichs Scholarly & Creative Activities Day
WASTE classifies this as Protocol · AI classification, approximate
A protocol that failed or needed troubleshooting — useful to read before you run the same steps.
Abstract (excerpt)
The purpose of our research was the process of trying to develop an algorithm that scanned for quantity of a type of object uploaded to a website. The potential algorithm itself was thought of as an instrumental part of a website that…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial comparing (extended) pleurectomy decortication versus no (extended) pleurectomy decortication for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
ProtocolRight to replicate? A preliminary comparative experimental approach to the use of replicas in taphonomic analyses using the scanning electron microscope
ProtocolDemonstrate the quality of your bereavement service
ProtocolProtocol: Comparative efficacy of 2 mL vs. 5 mL 0.375% ropivacaine in subparaneural upper trunk brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery-a randomized noninferiority trial.
ProtocolFusion Molecules Between the STAT5b Inhibitor Stafib-2-CR and a Cereblon Ligand.
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: Crossref · DOI 10.58809/dpxp5344