e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessSpecial aspects of education

Incorporating explicit discussions on the duality of reasoning into physics instruction

Alistair McInerny; Andrew Boudreaux; Mila Kryjevskaia · 2025 · Physical Review Physics Education Research

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

This article reports on a controlled study to investigate the efficacy of incorporating explicit discussions about the duality of human reasoning and its implications for learning in physics instruction. The central goal is to probe to what extent, if at all, such discussions improve student performance on tasks that tend to elicit intuitively appealing but incorrect responses. We hypothesized that explicitly discussing the reasoning pathways and hazards associated with the interactions between automatic process 1 and deliberate process 2 could boost students’ performance on a variety of topic

Abstract by Alistair McInerny; Andrew Boudreaux; Mila Kryjevskaia, Physical Review Physics Education Research (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.21.010135