e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 153

Human Scalp Electroencephalography Reveals that Repetition Suppression Varies with Expectation

Christopher Summerfield; Valentin Wyart; Vanessa M. Johnen; Vincent de Gardelle · 2011 · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Repetitions of a sensory event elicit lower levels of brain activity than its initial presentation ("repetition suppression," RS). According to one view, RS depends on the biophysics of neuronal discharge, and is thus an automatic consequence of stimulus processing ("fatigue" model). Another account suggests that RS depends on the statistical structure of the environment, and occurs when repeated stimuli are less surprising than novel stimuli ("surprise reduction" model). In support of the latter view, functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that RS is modulated by the local p

Abstract by Christopher Summerfield; Valentin Wyart; Vanessa M. Johnen; Vincent de Gardelle, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2011) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00067