e-ISSN: Pending
Replication FailureOpen accessNeuroscience· cited by 33

Replicating five pupillometry studies of Eckhard Hess

Joost de Winter; Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer; Lars Kooijman; Dimitra Dodou · 2021 · International Journal of Psychophysiology

WASTE classifies this as Replication Failure · AI classification, approximate

A previously reported effect did not replicate here — verify it holds before you build on it.

Abstract

Several papers by Eckhard Hess from the 1960s and 1970s report that the pupils dilate or constrict according to the interest value, arousing content, or mental demands of visual stimuli. However, Hess mostly used small sample sizes and undocumented luminance control. In a first experiment (N = 182) and a second preregistered experiment (N = 147), we replicated five studies of Hess using modern equipment. Our experiments (1) did not support the hypothesis of gender differences in pupil diameter change with respect to baseline (PC) when viewing stimuli of different interest value, (2) showed tha

Abstract by Joost de Winter; Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer; Lars Kooijman; Dimitra Dodou, International Journal of Psychophysiology (2021) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.03.003