e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMedical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid

Bedside personalized methods based on electrical impedance tomography or respiratory mechanics to set PEEP in ARDS and recruitment-to-inflation ratio: a physiologic study

Bertrand Pavlovsky; Christophe Desprez; Jean-Christophe Richard; Nicolas Fage; Arnaud Lesimple; Dara Chean; Antonin Courtais; Tommaso Mauri · 2024 · Annals of Intensive Care

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract Background Various Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration strategies have been proposed to optimize ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to compare PEEP titration strategies based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to methods derived from respiratory system mechanics with or without esophageal pressure measurements, in terms of PEEP levels and association with recruitability. Methods Nineteen patients with ARDS were enrolled. Recruitability was assessed by the estimated Recruitment-to-Inflation ratio (R/Iest) between PEEP 1

Abstract by Bertrand Pavlovsky; Christophe Desprez; Jean-Christophe Richard; Nicolas Fage; Arnaud Lesimple; Dara Chean; Antonin Courtais; Tommaso Mauri, Annals of Intensive Care (2024) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1186/s13613-023-01228-4