e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessComputer Science· cited by 26

Resolving data bias improves generalization in binding affinity prediction

David Graber; Peter Stockinger; Fabian Meyer; Siddhartha Mishra; Claus Horn; Rebecca Buller · 2025 · Nature Machine Intelligence

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

The field of computational drug design requires accurate scoring functions to predict binding affinities for protein-ligand interactions. However, train-test data leakage between the PDBbind database and the Comparative Assessment of Scoring Function benchmark datasets has severely inflated the performance metrics of currently available deep-learning-based binding affinity prediction models, leading to overestimation of their generalization capabilities. Here we address this issue by proposing PDBbind CleanSplit, a training dataset curated by a new structure-based filtering algorithm that elim

Abstract by David Graber; Peter Stockinger; Fabian Meyer; Siddhartha Mishra; Claus Horn; Rebecca Buller, Nature Machine Intelligence (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s42256-025-01124-5