Failure-mode index

Search what already failed

A searchable index of real negative results, null findings, and replication failures from the published literature — so you can learn what didn't work before repeating it.

All Replication Failure Negative / Null Result Report Failed Experiment Report Abandoned Hypothesis Methods Dead-End Short Note Null Dataset Protocol

WASTE indexes published research — it does not host or republish full papers. Each entry is a metadata record (title, authors, DOI) compiled from open scholarly databases, with the abstract shown in full only where the paper is openly licensed (e.g. Creative Commons); otherwise a short excerpt is shown for reference under fair use. WASTE classifies each work by failure type; classifications are automated and approximate.

By fieldMedicine 12,214 Computer Science 743 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 414 Social Sciences 302 Psychology 299 Physics 280 Neuroscience 243 Economics, Econometrics and Finance 196 Environmental Science 171 Mathematics 155 Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 Engineering 135

1 result in Protocol for "Mpro"

ProtocolOpen accessMedicine

Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial comparing (extended) pleurectomy decortication versus no (extended) pleurectomy decortication for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Eric Lim, Liz Darlison, John Edwards et al. · 2020 · BMJ Open

INTRODUCTION: Mesothelioma remains a lethal cancer. To date, systemic therapy with pemetrexed and a platinum drug remains the only licensed standard of care. As the median survival for patients with mesothelioma is 12.1 months, surgery is an important consideration to improve survival and/or quality of life. Currently, only two surgical trials have been performed which found that neither extensive (extra-pleural pneumonectomy) or limited (partial pleurectomy) surgery improved survival (although there was some evidence of improved quality of life). Therefore, clinicians are now looking to evalu

View details →DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038892Cited by 80