e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessSurgery

A compara tive analysis of short-term patient outcomes after laparoscop ic versus robotic rectal surgery

Chi Zhaocheng · 2022 · 结直肠肛门外科

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

[Background] The popularity of robot-assisted colorectal surgery has risen over recent years; however, patient-related advantages over laparoscopic surgery remain uncertain. [Objective] The goal of this study was to compare short-term patient outcomes following robotic and laparoscopic partial or complete rectal resections. [Design] This was a retrospective cohort study. [Settings] The study was conducted at 5 large tertiary care Kaiser Permanente medical centers across Southern California. [Patients] There were 863 consecutive robotic and laparoscopic pelvic rectal surgeries, including low an

Abstract by Chi Zhaocheng, 结直肠肛门外科 (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2022.02.019