Neuroscientific, Neuropsychological, and Psychological Evidence Comparably Impact Legal Decision Making: Implications for Experts and Legal Practitioners
Casey LaDuke; Benjamin Locklair; Kirk Heilbrun · 2018 · Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
Neuroscientific evidence is assuming an increasingly prominent role in criminal law, where it has considerable potential for affecting legal decision making. Our understanding of this effect is currently limited. Research initially…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Our Princess Is in Another Castle
Negative / Null Result ReportUsing Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial
Negative / Null Result ReportHow Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project
Negative / Null Result ReportThe cross-cultural validity of posttraumatic stress disorder: implications for DSM-5
Negative / Null Result ReportPsychiatric and medical correlates of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States
Negative / Null Result ReportRomantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1080/24732850.2018.1439142