Physics exam preparation: A comparison of three methods
Witat Fakcharoenphol; T. Stelzer · 2014 · Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
In this clinical study on helping students prepare for an exam, we compared three different treatments. All students were asked to take a practice exam. One group was then given worked-out solutions for that exam, another group was given the solutions and targeted exercises to do as homework based on the result of their practice exam, and the third group was given the solutions, homework, and also an hour of one-on-one tutoring. Participants from all three conditions significantly outperformed the control group on the midterm exam. However, participants that had one-on-one tutoring did not out
Abstract by Witat Fakcharoenphol; T. Stelzer, Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research (2014) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Our Princess Is in Another Castle
Negative / Null Result ReportUsing Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial
Negative / Null Result ReportHow Replicable Are Links Between Personality Traits and Consequential Life Outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project
Negative / Null Result ReportThe cross-cultural validity of posttraumatic stress disorder: implications for DSM-5
Negative / Null Result ReportPsychiatric and medical correlates of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States
Negative / Null Result ReportRomantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1103/physrevstper.10.010108