Inside the Buying Firm: Exploring Responses to Paradoxical Tensions in Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Chengyong Xiao; Miriam Wilhelm; Taco van der Vaart; Dirk Pieter van Donk · 2018 · Journal of Supply Chain Management
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
An instrumental perspective still dominates research on sustainable supply chain management ( SSCM ). As an alternative, this study presents a paradox perspective and argues that sustainability and other business aims are not always…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view
Negative / Null Result ReportJob satisfaction and organizational commitment effect in the transformational leadership towards employee performance
Negative / Null Result ReportDynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance
Negative / Null Result ReportDo Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes?
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance
Negative / Null Result ReportPine and Gilmore's Concept of Experience Economy and Its Dimensions: An Empirical Examination in Tourism
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1111/jscm.12170