e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessEnvironmental Science· cited by 281

Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature

Matthew C. Yates; Dylan J. Fraser; Alison M. Derry · 2019 · Environmental DNA

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract The use of eDNA to detect the presence/absence of rare or invasive species is well documented and its use in biodiversity monitoring is expanding. Preliminary laboratory research has also shown a positive correlation between the concentration of species‐specific eDNA particles and the density/biomass of a species in a given environment. However, the extent to which these results can be extended to natural environments has yet to be formally quantified. We collated data from experiments that examined the correlation between eDNA and two metrics of abundance (biomass and density) and, u

Abstract by Matthew C. Yates; Dylan J. Fraser; Alison M. Derry, Environmental DNA (2019) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1002/edn3.7