Another Failed Modal Collapse Argument
William Vincent · 2026 · Analysis
WASTE classifies this as Abandoned Hypothesis · AI classification, approximate
A hypothesis was tested and not supported — a dead end worth knowing about before you pursue it.
Abstract (excerpt)
Abstract The doctrine of divine simplicity says that God is not composed of parts (physical or metaphysical). Modal collapse arguments aim to show that the necessary co-existence of God and creation follows from the doctrine. As noted by…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Are we ready to genetically modify a human embryo? Or is it too late to ask?
Abandoned HypothesisStatistically responsible artificial intelligences
Abandoned HypothesisBefore We Can Find a Model, We Must Forget about Perfection
Abandoned HypothesisEditorial Commentary: Anterolateral Ligament: How Do We Find It?
Abandoned HypothesisEditorial Commentary: Long Head Biceps Pathology: How Do We Find It?
Abandoned HypothesisThe Failed Reader: Keats’s “Brain-Sick” Endymion
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: Crossref · DOI 10.1093/analys/anag013