e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessSocial Sciences· cited by 18

Labeling AI-generated media online

Chloe Wittenberg; Ziv Epstein; Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski; Adam J. Berinsky; David G. Rand · 2025 · PNAS Nexus

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

Abstract Recent advancements in generative AI have raised widespread concern about the use of this technology to spread audio and visual misinformation. In response, there has been a major push among policymakers and technology companies to label AI-generated media appearing online. It remains unclear, however, what types of labels are most effective for this purpose. Here, we evaluate two (potentially complementary) strategies for labeling AI-generated content online: (i) a process-based approach, aimed at clarifying how content was made and (ii) a harm-based approach, aimed at highlighting c

Abstract by Chloe Wittenberg; Ziv Epstein; Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski; Adam J. Berinsky; David G. Rand, PNAS Nexus (2025) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf170