The Long-Term Effect of Premier Pay for Performance on Patient Outcomes
Ashish K. Jha; Karen E. Joynt; E. John Orav; Arnold M. Epstein · 2012 · New England Journal of Medicine
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
BACKGROUND: Pay for performance has become a central strategy in the drive to improve health care. We assessed the long-term effect of the Medicare Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (HQID) on patient outcomes. METHODS: We…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
iTUG, a Sensitive and Reliable Measure of Mobility
Negative / Null Result ReportWhat do Workplace Wellness Programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study*
Negative / Null Result ReportHealth Literacy and Older Adults
Negative / Null Result ReportBiases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study
Negative / Null Result ReportInterventions to Prevent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Negative / Null Result ReportUnderstanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1056/nejmsa1112351