e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessMaterials Science· cited by 83

Why do we observe significant differences between measured and ‘back-calculated’ properties of natural fibres?

Darshil U. Shah; Ranajit Kumar Nag; Mike Clifford · 2016 · Cellulose

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract

The drive towards sustainability, even in materials technologies, has fuelled an increasing interest in bio-based composites. Cellulosic fibres, such as flax and jute, are being considered as alternatives to technical synthetic fibres, such as glass, as reinforcements in fibre reinforced polymer composites for a wide range of applications. A critical bottleneck in the advancement of plant fibre composites (PFRPs) is our current inability to predict PFRP properties from data on fibre properties. This is highly desirable in the cost- and time-effective development and design of optimised PFRP ma

Abstract by Darshil U. Shah; Ranajit Kumar Nag; Mike Clifford, Cellulose (2016) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1007/s10570-016-0926-x