FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF RECYCLED RUBBER TILES OF DIFFERENT POROSITY
A. M. Samy; Y. M. El-Sherbiny; W. Y. Ali · 2013 · Journal of the Egyptian Society of Tribology
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe present study discusses the frictional behaviour of porous recycled rubber used for a wide variety of architectural applications as flooring tiles. This type of flooring tiles, of the relatively high resilience, are used in schools, boutiques, hospitals, offices, conference rooms, homes, trade fair stands and homes for the aged. Experiments were carried out by the sliding of the bare foot and rubber footwear against the tested rubber tiles of different porosity, where friction coefficient was tested. A test rig was designed and manufactured for the test. Loads were applied by foot
Abstract by A. M. Samy; Y. M. El-Sherbiny; W. Y. Ali, Journal of the Egyptian Society of Tribology (2013) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data
Negative / Null Result ReportMeteorological Causes of the Secular Variations in Observed Extreme Precipitation Events for the Conterminous United States
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Next Generation of Sepsis Clinical Trial Designs
Negative / Null Result ReportAnalysis of DNA Methylation in Young People: Limited Evidence for an Association Between Victimization Stress and Epigenetic Variation in Blood
Negative / Null Result ReportStudy preregistration: an early example and analysis.
Negative / Null Result ReportInsights Into LSTM Fully Convolutional Networks for Time Series Classification
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.21608/jest.2013.80554