An In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of White Pro Root MTA and Root MTA in Retro Grade Cavity
L Safi; A Adl; T Ebrahimi Moghadam · 2007 · مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate and compare the amount of microleakage of two types of root end filling materials, white Pro Root MTA (Dentsply) and Iranian MTA (Root MTA).Methods and Materials: In this laboratory study, 34 extracted single root and canal human teeth were selected. Root canals were cleaned, shaped and obdurate. Experimental samples were divided randomly in to 2 groups of 15 specimens. Root tips were sectioned in perpendicular angel and root end cavities were prepared. In first group, white Pro Root MTA and in second group, Root MTA was used as root end filling m
Abstract by L Safi; A Adl; T Ebrahimi Moghadam, مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان (2007) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
Negative / Null Result ReportBioactivity evaluation of three calcium silicate‐based endodontic materials
Negative / Null Result ReportIncidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars-a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population
Negative / Null Result ReportAnti‐infective therapy of peri‐implantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: 12‐month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial
Negative / Null Result ReportExploring the genetic basis of chronic periodontitis: a genome-wide association study
Negative / Null Result ReportIn Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ