Informer in Algorithmic Investment Strategies on High Frequency Bitcoin Data
Filip Stefaniuk; Robert Ślepaczuk · 2025 · arXiv
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
The article investigates the usage of Informer architecture for building automated trading strategies for high frequency Bitcoin data. Three strategies using Informer model with different loss functions: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Generalized Mean Absolute Directional Loss (GMADL) and Quantile loss, are proposed and evaluated against the Buy and Hold benchmark and two benchmark strategies based on technical indicators. The evaluation is conducted using data of various frequencies: 5 minute, 15 minute, and 30 minute intervals, over the 6 different periods. Although the Informer-based model
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
The Oregon Experiment — Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes
Negative / Null Result ReportMicrocredit in Theory and Practice: Using Randomized Credit Scoring for Impact Evaluation
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)
Negative / Null Result ReportPushing on a string: US monetary policy is less powerful in recessions ∗
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Evidence on Globalisation
Negative / Null Result ReportStatistical tests for power-law cross-correlated processes
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: arXiv