e-ISSN: Pending
Replication FailureOpen accessDecision Sciences· cited by 80

Low replicability can support robust and efficient science

Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer · 2020 · Nature Communications

WASTE classifies this as Replication Failure · AI classification, approximate

A previously reported effect did not replicate here — verify it holds before you build on it.

The finding, in one line

Even some seemingly well-established findings have failed to replicate.

Abstract

There is a broad agreement that psychology is facing a replication crisis. Even some seemingly well-established findings have failed to replicate. Numerous causes of the crisis have been identified, such as underpowered studies, publication bias, imprecise theories, and inadequate statistical procedures. The replication crisis is real, but it is less clear how it should be resolved. Here we examine potential solutions by modeling a scientific community under various different replication regimes. In one regime, all findings are replicated before publication to guard against subsequent replicat

Abstract by Stephan Lewandowsky; Klaus Oberauer, Nature Communications (2020) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-14203-0