e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessSocial Sciences· cited by 19

No Significant Difference - Unless you are a Jumper

Richard Fendler; Craig Ruff; Milind Shrikhande · 2018 · Online Learning

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

The finding, in one line

Much of the e-education literature suggests that there is no significant difference in aggregate student learning outcomes between online and face-to-face instruction.

Abstract

Much of the e-education literature suggests that there is no significant difference in aggregate student learning outcomes between online and face-to-face instruction. In this study, we develop a model that forecasts the grade that individual students would have most likely earned in the alternate class setting. Students for whom the difference between the actual grade received in one class format (for example, online) and the forecasted grade in the other class setting (for example, face-to-face) is one full letter grade or higher are called “jumpers.” Our findings indicate that jumpers are n

Abstract by Richard Fendler; Craig Ruff; Milind Shrikhande, Online Learning (2018) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.24059/olj.v22i1.887