Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty
Iqra Zakir; Ahmad Ahmad; Hamdan Pasha; Shakil Aqil; Saeed Akhtar · 2022 · Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
Introduction:Tympanoplasty is a common surgery for chronic otitis media and has conventionally been performed with a microscope for decades. The trend of endoscopic minimally invasive surgeries has been increasing worldwide for the last few decades. Few studies have discussed the outcomes of microscopic and endoscopic tympanoplasty. This study aims to compare results of tympanoplasty done with microscope vs endoscope in terms of graft take rate and improvement in conductive hearing loss.Materials and Methods:We did a retrospective review of 120 patients (54 male and 66 female) who underwent Ty
Abstract by Iqra Zakir; Ahmad Ahmad; Hamdan Pasha; Shakil Aqil; Saeed Akhtar, Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (2022) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Music Appreciation of Cochlear Implant Users versus Normal Hearing Individuals
Negative / Null Result ReportEffect of age on virtual reality-assisted subjective visual vertical and subjective visual horizontal at different head-tilt angles
Negative / Null Result ReportUm estudo piloto na avaliação das estratégias posturais em jovens e idosos usando um sistema eletromagnético tridimensional A pilot study on the evaluation of postural strategies in young and elderly subjects using a tridimensional electromagnetic system
Negative / Null Result ReportClinical Care Pathway Time Intervals and Tumor Progression Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients at East Avenue Medical Center Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.22038/ijorl.2022.61234.3104