User Willingness to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence Based on AIDUA Framework
WANG Weizheng, QIAO Hong, LI Xiaojun, WANG Jingjing · 2024 · Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
[Purpose/Significance] Generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been widely used in many fields, and the application of this technology has become popular among researchers. However, there are few studies on the willingness of researchers willingness to accept generative AI. This leads to an insufficient understanding of the psychological mechanism, cognitive process and behavioral pattern of users' acceptance of generative AI, which limits the ability of theoretical innovation and practical exploration in user information behavior. This study focuses on researchers acceptance of
Abstract by WANG Weizheng, QIAO Hong, LI Xiaojun, WANG Jingjing, Nongye tushu qingbao xuebao (2024) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data
Negative / Null Result ReportMeteorological Causes of the Secular Variations in Observed Extreme Precipitation Events for the Conterminous United States
Negative / Null Result ReportThe Next Generation of Sepsis Clinical Trial Designs
Negative / Null Result ReportAnalysis of DNA Methylation in Young People: Limited Evidence for an Association Between Victimization Stress and Epigenetic Variation in Blood
Negative / Null Result ReportStudy preregistration: an early example and analysis.
Negative / Null Result ReportInsights Into LSTM Fully Convolutional Networks for Time Series Classification
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0076