Identification and location tasks rely on different mental processes: a diffusion model account of validity effects in spatial cueing paradigms with emotional stimuli
Roland Imhoff; Jens Lange; Markus Germar · 2018 · Cognition & Emotion
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
Spatial cueing paradigms are popular tools to assess human attention to emotional stimuli, but different variants of these paradigms differ in what participants' primary task is. In one variant, participants indicate the location of the…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
Hosted by the publisher — may require access.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Aggregation Kinetics of Graphene Oxides in Aqueous Solutions: Experiments, Mechanisms, and Modeling
Negative / Null Result ReportThe reaction between metakaolin and limestone and its effect in porosity refinement and mechanical properties
Negative / Null Result ReportTuning Alginate Bioink Stiffness and Composition for Controlled Growth Factor Delivery and to Spatially Direct MSC Fate within Bioprinted Tissues
Negative / Null Result ReportEx-situ characterisation of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Negative / Null Result ReportCobb Angle Measurement of Spine from X-Ray Images Using Convolutional Neural Network
Negative / Null Result ReportDeterminants of residential water consumption: Evidence and analysis from a 10‐country household survey
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1080/02699931.2018.1443433