Randomized study to compare nasojejunal with nasogastric nutrition in critically ill patients without prior evidence of altered gastric emptying
Gilberto Friedman; Cecilia Lopes Flávia Couto; Maicon Becker · 2015 · Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies comparing jejunal and gastric nutrition show inconsistent results regarding pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pneumonia comparing gastric with jejunal nutrition. Secondarily, we…
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
n–3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Dysglycemia
Replication FailureRandomised placebo-controlled trial of teduglutide in reducing parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid requirements in patients with short bowel syndrome
Negative / Null Result ReportAgricultural commercialization and nutrition revisited: Empirical evidence from three African countries
Negative / Null Result ReportEffect of ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Young People at Ultrahigh Risk for Psychotic Disorders
Negative / Null Result ReportThe diversity and function of sourdough starter microbiomes
Replication FailureSelenium supplementation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.4103/0972-5229.151013