A step forwards on the Erdős-Sós problem concerning the Ramsey numbers $R(3,k)$
Rujie Zhu; Xiaodong Xu; Stanisław Radziszowski · 2015 · arXiv
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
Let $Δ_s=R(K_3,K_s)-R(K_3,K_{s-1})$, where $R(G,H)$ is the Ramsey number of graphs $G$ and $H$ defined as the smallest $n$ such that any edge coloring of $K_n$ with two colors contains $G$ in the first color or $H$ in the second color. In 1980, Erdős and Sós posed some questions about the growth of $Δ_s$. The best known concrete bounds on $Δ_s$ are $3 \le Δ_s \le s$, and they have not improved since the stating of the problem. In this paper we present some constructions, which imply in particular that $R(K_3,K_s) \ge R(K_3,K_{s-1}-e) + 4$. This does not improve the lower bound of 3 on $Δ_s$, b
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Channeling Fisher: Randomization Tests and the Statistical Insignificance of Seemingly Significant Experimental Results*
Negative / Null Result ReportThe harmonic mean p -value for combining dependent tests
Negative / Null Result ReportGeneralizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples
Negative / Null Result ReportNumerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1–6
Negative / Null Result ReportMethods Matter: p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics
Negative / Null Result ReportShould multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: arXiv