BEAVRS BENCHMARK EVALUATION WITH CASMO5 AND SIMULATE5
Bahadir Tamer · 2021 · EPJ Web of Conferences
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
The MIT BEAVRS benchmark problem, which was primarily setup for the verification and validation of high-fidelity tools that have coupled neutron transport, thermal-hydraulics, and fuel isotopic depletion models, has also found extensive usage in the reactor physics community for validating core analysis tools. The primary purpose of this paper is to provide an accurate, comprehensive evaluation of the BEAVRS benchmark with CASMO5 and SIMULATE5 codes. The CMS5 calculated results for low-power physics tests (hot zero power critical boron, control rod worth and isothermal temperature coefficients
Abstract by Bahadir Tamer, EPJ Web of Conferences (2021) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Resonant amplitude distribution of the Hilda asteroids and the free-floating planet flyby scenario
Negative / Null Result Report3D Simulations of Plasma Filaments in the Scrape Off Layer: A Comparison with Models of Reduced Dimensionality
Negative / Null Result ReportHerd Behaviour in Public Goods Games
Negative / Null Result ReportAccurate coarse-graining of small organic molecules in melts and thin films using density-dependent potentials
Negative / Null Result ReportSemi-Analytical Models for Lensing by Dark Halos: I. Splitting Angles
Negative / Null Result ReportSimulated Annealing with Tsallis Weights - A Numerical Comparison
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.1051/epjconf/202124706022