e-ISSN: Pending
Replication FailureOpen accessPsychology· cited by 65

A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju and Csibra (2007)

Dóra Kampis; Petra Karman; Gergely Csibra; Victoria Southgate; Mikołaj Hernik · 2021 · Royal Society Open Science

WASTE classifies this as Replication Failure · AI classification, approximate

A previously reported effect did not replicate here — verify it holds before you build on it.

Abstract

, 587-592. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01944.x)) has been widely cited as evidence for false-belief attribution in young children. Recent replication attempts of this paradigm have yielded mixed results: several studies did not replicate the original findings, raising doubts about the suitability of the paradigm to assess non-verbal action prediction and Theory of Mind. In a preregistered collaborative study including two of the original authors, we tested one hundred and sixty 24- to 26-month-olds across two locations using the original stimuli, procedure and analyses as closely as possible

Abstract by Dóra Kampis; Petra Karman; Gergely Csibra; Victoria Southgate; Mikołaj Hernik, Royal Society Open Science (2021) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.1098/rsos.210190