Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Three Different Curing Techniques
Hakan Türkkahraman; Cenker Küçükeşmen · 2005 · Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract
The aim of our study was to compare shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded with chemically cured, halogen light cured and LED cured adhesive systems. 45 extracted human premolar teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups. Bicuspid metal brackets were bonded on first group of teeth with chemically cured bonding system (Rely-a-Bond). Second group were bonded with halogen light cured bonding system (Light Bond). Last group were bonded with LED light cured bonding system (Light Bond). Each specimen was then loaded to universal testing machine. Bond strength was determined in the shear
Abstract by Hakan Türkkahraman; Cenker Küçükeşmen, Turkish Journal of Orthodontics (2005) — licensed CC BY 4.0.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
Negative / Null Result ReportBioactivity evaluation of three calcium silicate‐based endodontic materials
Negative / Null Result ReportIncidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars-a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population
Negative / Null Result ReportAnti‐infective therapy of peri‐implantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: 12‐month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial
Negative / Null Result ReportExploring the genetic basis of chronic periodontitis: a genome-wide association study
Negative / Null Result ReportIn Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: DOAJ · DOI 10.13076/1300-3550-18-1-5