Intent Demonstration in General-Sum Dynamic Games via Iterative Linear-Quadratic Approximations
Jingqi Li; Anand Siththaranjan; Somayeh Sojoudi; Claire Tomlin; Andrea Bajcsy · 2024 · arXiv
WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate
The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.
Abstract (excerpt)
Autonomous agents should coordinate effectively without prior knowledge of others' intents. While prior work has focused on intent inference, we address the inverse problem: how agents can strategically demonstrate their intents within general-sum dynamic games. We model this problem and propose an algorithm that balances intent demonstration with task performance. To handle nonlinear dynamic games with continuous state-action spaces, our method leverages iterative linear-quadratic game approximations and provides efficient intent-teaching guarantees: the uncertain agent's belief can be driven
Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.
About to run something similar?
Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.
Related failures
Aggregation Kinetics of Graphene Oxides in Aqueous Solutions: Experiments, Mechanisms, and Modeling
Negative / Null Result ReportThe reaction between metakaolin and limestone and its effect in porosity refinement and mechanical properties
Negative / Null Result ReportTuning Alginate Bioink Stiffness and Composition for Controlled Growth Factor Delivery and to Spatially Direct MSC Fate within Bioprinted Tissues
Negative / Null Result ReportEx-situ characterisation of gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Negative / Null Result ReportCobb Angle Measurement of Spine from X-Ray Images Using Convolutional Neural Network
Negative / Null Result ReportDeterminants of residential water consumption: Evidence and analysis from a 10‐country household survey
WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.
Metadata source: arXiv
