e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessSocial Sciences· cited by 166

Measuring Learning Effectiveness: A New Look at No-Significant-Difference Findings

Ernest H. Joy; Federico E. Garcia · 2019 · Online Learning

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

The finding, in one line

Much of the literature purports to have found no significant difference in learning effectiveness between technology-based and conventional delivery media.

Abstract

Researchers, instructional designers and consumers of ALNs must be cautious when interpreting results of media comparison studies. Much of the literature purports to have found no significant difference in learning effectiveness between technology-based and conventional delivery media. This research, though, is largely flawed. In this paper, we first outline the philosophical positions of the opposing sides of an intense debate in the literature as to whether delivery media alone influence learning outcomes. We then select at random several representative media comparison studies to illustrate

Abstract by Ernest H. Joy; Federico E. Garcia, Online Learning (2019) — licensed CC BY 4.0.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: OpenAlex · DOI 10.24059/olj.v4i1.1909