e-ISSN: Pending
Negative / Null Result ReportOpen accessPhysics

Admire vs. Safire: Objective comparison of CT reconstruction algorithms and their noise properties

Ingvild Dalehaug; Kirsten Nygaard Bolstad; Daniel Aadnevik; Silje Flataboe; Helge Egil Seime Pettersen · 2017 · arXiv

WASTE classifies this as Negative / Null Result Report · AI classification, approximate

The study found no significant effect — useful as a negative control or null benchmark for your own design.

Abstract (excerpt)

Purpose: Siemens has developed several iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on their CT scanners. SAFIRE is available on most of their CT scanners. The latest algorithm, ADMIRE, is available on their newest high-end CT scanners. The aim of our study was to compare the noise reduction properties of the two IR algorithms using objective methods. Methods and Materials: The homogeneous module of the Catphan phantom was scanned on a Siemens AS+ and a Siemens Flash CT scanner using an axial abdomen protocol with fixed tube current at two dose levels. The images were reconstructed with an abdomen

Excerpt shown for reference under fair use — read the full paper at the publisher.

About to run something similar?

Run an AI Precheck on your own design to catch failure modes like this one before you spend the time. Your first desk check is free.

WASTE indexes this work — it does not host or republish it. Failure-type classification is automated and approximate.

Metadata source: arXiv